Florida Lemon Law

This is a summary of the Florida Lemon Law Statute.  The Federal Lemon Law Statute (or Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act) can be found here.

Covered Vehicles:
Vehicles sold, transferred or leased , in the state, and used primarily for personal, family or household purposes, excluding off-road vehicles, mopeds, trucks over 10,000 lbs., the living facilities of recreation vehicles, and motorcycles.

Repair Attempts or Days out of Service:
3 repair attempts – 30 days out of service.

Coverage Period:
18 months or 24,000 miles, whichever occurs first.


This is the full text of the Florida Lemon Law Statute.  The Federal Lemon Law Statute (or Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act) can be found here.

Chapter 681
Motor Vehicle Sales Warranties
Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act

681.10 Short title.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act.”

681.101 Legislative intent.
The Legislature recognizes that a motor vehicle is a major consumer purchase and that a defective motor vehicle undoubtedly creates a hardship for the consumer. The Legislature further recognizes that a duly franchised motor vehicle dealer is an authorized service agent of the manufacturer. It is the intent of the Legislature that a good faith motor vehicle warranty complaint by a consumer be resolved by the manufacturer within a specified period of time; however, it is not the intent of the Legislature that a consumer establish the presumption of a reasonable number of attempts as to each manufacturer that provides a warranty directly to the consumer. It is further the intent of the Legislature to provide the statutory procedures whereby a consumer may receive a replacement motor vehicle, or a full refund, for a motor vehicle which cannot be brought into conformity with the warranty provided for in this chapter. However, nothing in this chapter shall in any way limit or expand the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.

681.102 Definitions.
As used in this chapter, the term:

(1) “Authorized service agent” means any person, including a franchised motor vehicle dealer, who is authorized by the manufacturer to service motor vehicles. In the case of a recreational vehicle when there are two or more manufacturers, an authorized service agent for any individual manufacturer is any person, including a franchised motor vehicle dealer, who is authorized to service the items warranted by that manufacturer. The term does not include a rental car company authorized to repair rental vehicles.
(2) “Board” means the Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board.
(3) “Collateral charges” means those additional charges to a consumer wholly incurred as a result of the acquisition of the motor vehicle. For the purposes of this chapter, collateral charges include, but are not limited to, manufacturer-installed or agent-installed items or service charges, earned finance charges, sales taxes, and title charges.
(4) “Consumer” means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, or the lessee, of a motor vehicle primarily used for personal, family, or household purposes; any person to whom such motor vehicle is transferred for the same purposes during the duration of the Lemon Law rights period; and any other person entitled by the terms of the warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty.
(5) “Days” means calendar days.
(6) “Department” means the Department of Legal Affairs.
(7) “Division” means the Division of Consumer Services of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
(8) “Incidental charges” means those reasonable costs to the consumer which are directly caused by the nonconformity of the motor vehicle.
(9) “Lease price” means the aggregate of the capitalized cost, as defined in s. 521.003(2), and each of the following items to the extent not included in the capitalized cost:

(a) Lessor’s earned rent charges through the date of repurchase.
(b) Collateral charges, if applicable.
(c) Any fee paid to another to obtain the lease.
(d) Any insurance or other costs expended by the lessor for the benefit of the lessee.
(e) An amount equal to state and local sales taxes, not otherwise included as collateral charges, paid by the lessor when the vehicle was initially purchased.

(10) “Lemon Law rights period” means the period ending 24 months after the date of the original delivery of a motor vehicle to a consumer.
(11) “Lessee” means any consumer who leases a motor vehicle for 1 year or more pursuant to a written lease agreement which provides that the lessee is responsible for repairs to such motor vehicle or any consumer who leases a motor vehicle pursuant to a lease-purchase agreement.
(12) “Lessee cost” means the aggregate deposit and rental payments previously paid to the lessor for the leased vehicle but excludes debt from any other transaction.
(13) “Lessor” means a person who holds title to a motor vehicle that is leased to a lessee under a written lease agreement or who holds the lessor’s rights under such agreement.
(14) “Manufacturer” means any person, whether a resident or nonresident of this state, who manufactures or assembles motor vehicles, or who manufactures or assembles chassis for recreational vehicles, or who manufactures or installs on previously assembled truck or recreational vehicle chassis special bodies or equipment which, when installed, forms an integral part of the motor vehicle, a distributor as defined in s. 320.60(5), or an importer as defined in s. 320.60(7). A dealer as defined in s. 320.60(11)(a) shall not be deemed to be a manufacturer, distributor, or importer as provided in this section.
(15) “Motor vehicle” means a new vehicle, propelled by power other than muscular power, which is sold in this state to transport persons or property, and includes a recreational vehicle or a vehicle used as a demonstrator or leased vehicle if a manufacturer’s warranty was issued as a condition of sale, or the lessee is responsible for repairs, but does not include vehicles run only upon tracks, off-road vehicles, trucks over 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight, motorcycles, mopeds, or the living facilities of recreational vehicles. “Living facilities of recreational vehicles” are those portions designed, used, or maintained primarily as living quarters and include, but are not limited to, the flooring, plumbing system and fixtures, roof air conditioner, furnace, generator, electrical systems other than automotive circuits, the side entrance door, exterior compartments, and windows other than the windshield and driver and front passenger windows.
(16) “Nonconformity” means a defect or condition that substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of a motor vehicle, but does not include a defect or condition that results from an accident, abuse, neglect, modification, or alteration of the motor vehicle by persons other than the manufacturer or its authorized service agent.
(17) “Procedure” means an informal dispute-settlement procedure established by a manufacturer to mediate and arbitrate motor vehicle warranty disputes.
(18) “Program” means the mediation and arbitration pilot program for recreational vehicles established in this chapter.
(19) “Purchase price” means the cash price as defined in s. 520.31(1), inclusive of any allowance for a trade-in vehicle, but excludes debt from any other transaction. “Any allowance for a trade-in vehicle” means the net trade-in allowance as reflected in the purchase contract or lease agreement if acceptable to the consumer and manufacturer. If such amount is not acceptable to the consumer and manufacturer, then the trade-in allowance shall be an amount equal to 100 percent of the retail price of the trade-in vehicle as reflected in the NADA Official Used Car Guide (Southeastern Edition) or NADA Recreation Vehicle Appraisal Guide, whichever is applicable, in effect at the time of the trade-in. The manufacturer shall be responsible for providing the applicable NADA book.
(20) “Reasonable offset for use” means the number of miles attributable to a consumer up to the date of a settlement agreement or arbitration hearing, whichever occurs first, multiplied by the purchase price of the vehicle and divided by 120,000, except in the case of a recreational vehicle, in which event it shall be divided by 60,000.
(21) “Recreational vehicle” means a motor vehicle primarily designed to provide temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, or travel use, but does not include a van conversion.
(22) “Replacement motor vehicle” means a motor vehicle which is identical or reasonably equivalent to the motor vehicle to be replaced, as the motor vehicle to be replaced existed at the time of acquisition. “Reasonably equivalent to the motor vehicle to be replaced” means the manufacturer’s suggested retail price of the replacement vehicle shall not exceed 105 percent of the manufacturer’s suggested retail price of the motor vehicle to be replaced. In the case of a recreational vehicle, “reasonably equivalent to the motor vehicle to be replaced” means the retail price of the replacement vehicle shall not exceed 105 percent of the purchase price of the recreational vehicle to be replaced.
(23) “Warranty” means any written warranty issued by the manufacturer, or any affirmation of fact or promise made by the manufacturer, excluding statements made by the dealer, in connection with the sale of a motor vehicle to a consumer which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship and affirms or promises that such material or workmanship is free of defects or will meet a specified level of performance.

681.103 Duty of manufacturer to conform a motor vehicle to the warranty.

(1) If a motor vehicle does not conform to the warranty and the consumer first reports the problem to the manufacturer or its authorized service agent during the Lemon Law rights period, the manufacturer or its authorized service agent shall make such repairs as are necessary to conform the vehicle to the warranty, irrespective of whether such repairs are made after the expiration of the Lemon Law rights period. Such repairs shall be at no cost to the consumer if made during the term of the manufacturer’s written express warranty. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to grant an extension of the Lemon Law rights period or to expand the time within which a consumer must file a claim under this chapter.
(2) Each manufacturer shall provide to its consumers conspicuous notice of the address and phone number for its zone, district, or regional office for this state in the written warranty or owner’s manual. By January 1 of each year, each manufacturer shall forward to the Department of Legal Affairs a copy of the owner’s manual and any written warranty for each make and model of motor vehicle that it sells in this state.
(3) At the time of acquisition, the manufacturer shall inform the consumer clearly and conspicuously in writing how and where to file a claim with a certified procedure if such procedure has been established by the manufacturer pursuant to s. 681.108. The manufacturer shall provide to the dealer and, at the time of acquisition, the dealer shall provide to the consumer a written statement that explains the consumer’s rights under this chapter. The written statement shall be prepared by the Department of Legal Affairs and shall contain a toll-free number for the division that the consumer can contact to obtain information regarding the consumer’s rights and obligations under this chapter or to commence arbitration. If the manufacturer obtains a signed receipt for timely delivery of sufficient quantities of this written statement to meet the dealer’s vehicle sales requirements, it shall constitute prima facie evidence of compliance with this subsection by the manufacturer. The consumer’s signed acknowledgment of receipt of materials required under this subsection shall constitute prima facie evidence of compliance by the manufacturer and dealer. The form of the acknowledgments shall be approved by the Department of Legal Affairs, and the dealer shall maintain the consumer’s signed acknowledgment for 3 years.
(4) A manufacturer, through its authorized service agent, shall provide to the consumer, each time the consumer’s motor vehicle is returned after being examined or repaired under the warranty, a fully itemized, legible statement or repair order indicating any test drive performed and the approximate length of the test drive, any diagnosis made, and all work performed on the motor vehicle including, but not limited to, a general description of the problem reported by the consumer or an identification of the defect or condition, parts and labor, the date and the odometer reading when the motor vehicle was submitted for examination or repair, and the date when the repair or examination was completed.

681.104 Nonconformity of motor vehicles.

(1)

(a) After three attempts have been made to repair the same nonconformity, the consumer shall give written notification, by registered or express mail to the manufacturer, of the need to repair the nonconformity to allow the manufacturer a final attempt to cure the nonconformity. The manufacturer shall have 10 days, commencing upon receipt of such notification, to respond and give the consumer the opportunity to have the motor vehicle repaired at a reasonably accessible repair facility within a reasonable time after the consumer’s receipt of the response. The manufacturer shall have 10 days, except in the case of a recreational vehicle, in which event the manufacturer shall have 45 days, commencing upon the delivery of the motor vehicle to the designated repair facility by the consumer, to conform the motor vehicle to the warranty. If the manufacturer fails to respond to the consumer and give the consumer the opportunity to have the motor vehicle repaired at a reasonably accessible repair facility or perform the repairs within the time periods prescribed in this subsection, the requirement that the manufacturer be given a final attempt to cure the nonconformity does not apply.
(b) If the motor vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of one or more nonconformities by the manufacturer or its authorized service agent for a cumulative total of 15 or more days, exclusive of downtime for routine maintenance prescribed by the owner’s manual, the consumer shall so notify the manufacturer in writing by registered or express mail to give the manufacturer or its authorized service agent an opportunity to inspect or repair the vehicle.

(2)

(a) If the manufacturer, or its authorized service agent, cannot conform the motor vehicle to the warranty by repairing or correcting any nonconformity after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer, within 40 days, shall repurchase the motor vehicle and refund the full purchase price to the consumer, less a reasonable offset for use, or, in consideration of its receipt of payment from the consumer of a reasonable offset for use, replace the motor vehicle with a replacement motor vehicle acceptable to the consumer. The refund or replacement must include all reasonably incurred collateral and incidental charges. However, the consumer has an unconditional right to choose a refund rather than a replacement motor vehicle. Upon receipt of such refund or replacement, the consumer, lien holder, or lessor shall furnish to the manufacturer clear title to and possession of the motor vehicle.
(b) Refunds shall be made to the consumer and lien holder of record, if any, as their interests may appear. If applicable, refunds shall be made to the lessor and lessee as follows: The lessee shall receive the lessee cost and the lessor shall receive the lease price less the lessee cost. A penalty for early lease termination may not be assessed against a lessee who receives a replacement motor vehicle or refund under this chapter. The Department of Revenue shall refund to the manufacturer any sales tax which the manufacturer refunded to the consumer, lien holder, or lessor under this section, if the manufacturer provides to the department a written request for a refund and evidence that the sales tax was paid when the vehicle was purchased and that the manufacturer refunded the sales tax to the consumer, lien holder, or lessor.

(3) It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the warranty if, during the Lemon Law rights period, either:

(a) The same nonconformity has been subject to repair at least three times by the manufacturer or its authorized service agent, plus a final attempt by the manufacturer to repair the motor vehicle if undertaken as provided for in paragraph (1)(a), and such nonconformity continues to exist; or
(b) The motor vehicle has been out of service by reason of repair of one or more nonconformities by the manufacturer, or its authorized service agent, for a cumulative total of 30 or more days, 60 or more days in the case of a recreational vehicle, exclusive of downtime for routine maintenance prescribed by the owner’s manual. The manufacturer or its authorized service agent must have had at least one opportunity to inspect or repair the vehicle following receipt of the notification as provided in paragraph (1)(b). The 30-day period, or 60-day period in the case of a recreational vehicle, may be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster.

(4) It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this chapter that:

(a) The alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, value, or safety of the motor vehicle;
(b) The nonconformity is the result of an accident, abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the motor vehicle by persons other than the manufacturer or its authorized service agent; or
(c) The claim by the consumer was not filed in good faith.
Any other affirmative defense allowed by law may be raised against the claim.

681.106 Bad faith claims.
Any claim by a consumer which is found by the court to have been filed in bad faith or solely for the purpose of harassment, or in complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised by the consumer, shall result in the consumer being liable for all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by the manufacturer, or its agent, as a direct result of the bad faith claim.

681.108 Dispute-settlement procedures.

(1) If a manufacturer has established a procedure, which the division has certified as substantially complying with the provisions of 16 C.F.R. part 703, in effect October 1, 1983, and with the provisions of this chapter and the rules adopted under this chapter, and has informed the consumer how and where to file a claim with such procedure pursuant to s. 681.103(3), the provisions of s. 681.104(2) apply to the consumer only if the consumer has first resorted to such procedure. The decision makers for a certified procedure shall, in rendering decisions, take into account all legal and equitable factors germane to a fair and just decision, including, but not limited to, the warranty; the rights and remedies conferred under 16 C.F.R. part 703, in effect October 1, 1983; the provisions of this chapter; and any other equitable considerations appropriate under the circumstances. Decision makers and staff of a procedure shall be trained in the provisions of this chapter and in 16 C.F.R. part 703, in effect October 1, 1983. In an action brought by a consumer concerning an alleged nonconformity, the decision that results from a certified procedure is admissible in evidence.
(2) A manufacturer may apply to the division for certification of its procedure. After receipt and evaluation of the application, the division shall certify the procedure or notify the manufacturer of any deficiencies in the application or the procedure.
(3) A certified procedure or a procedure of an applicant seeking certification shall submit to the division a copy of each settlement approved by the procedure or decision made by a decision maker within 30 days after the settlement is reached or the decision is rendered. The decision or settlement must contain at a minimum the:

  1. Name and address of the consumer;
  2. Name of the manufacturer and address of the dealership from which the motor vehicle was purchased;
  3. Date the claim was received and the location of the procedure office that handled the claim;
  4. Relief requested by the consumer;
  5. Name of each decision maker rendering the decision or person approving the settlement;
  6. Statement of the terms of the settlement or decision;
  7. Date of the settlement or decision; and
  8. Statement of whether the decision was accepted or rejected by the consumer.

(4) Any manufacturer establishing or applying to establish a certified procedure must file with the division a copy of the annual audit required under the provisions of 16 C.F.R. part 703, in effect October 1, 1983, together with any additional information required for purposes of certification, including the number of refunds and replacements made in this state pursuant to the provisions of this chapter by the manufacturer during the period audited.
(5) The division shall review each certified procedure at least annually, prepare an annual report evaluating the operation of certified procedures established by motor vehicle manufacturers and procedures of applicants seeking certification, and, for a period not to exceed 1 year, shall grant certification to, or renew certification for, those manufacturers whose procedures substantially comply with the provisions of 16 C.F.R. part 703, in effect October 1, 1983, and with the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted under this chapter. If certification is revoked or denied, the division shall state the reasons for such action. The reports and records of actions taken with respect to certification shall be public records.
(6) A manufacturer whose certification is denied or revoked is entitled to a hearing pursuant to chapter 120.
(7) If federal preemption of state authority to regulate procedures occurs, the provisions of subsection (1) concerning prior resort do not apply.
(8) The division shall adopt rules to implement this section.

681.109 Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board.
Dispute eligibility.

(1) If a manufacturer has a certified procedure, a consumer claim arising during the Lemon Law rights period must be filed with the certified procedure no later than 60 days after the expiration of the Lemon Law rights period. If a decision is not rendered by the certified procedure within 40 days of filing, the consumer may apply to the division to have the dispute removed to the board for arbitration.
(2) If a manufacturer has a certified procedure, a consumer claim arising during the Lemon Law rights period must be filed with the certified procedure no later than 60 days after the expiration of the Lemon Law rights period. If a consumer is not satisfied with the decision or the manufacturer’s compliance therewith, the consumer may apply to the division to have the dispute submitted to the board for arbitration. A manufacturer may not seek review of a decision made under its procedure.
(3) If a manufacturer has no certified procedure or if a certified procedure does not have jurisdiction to resolve the dispute, a consumer may apply directly to the division to have the dispute submitted to the board for arbitration.
(4) A consumer must request arbitration before the board with respect to a claim arising during the Lemon Law rights period no later than 60 days after the expiration of the Lemon Law rights period, or within 30 days after the final action of a certified procedure, whichever date occurs later.
(5) The division shall screen all requests for arbitration before the board to determine eligibility. The consumer’s request for arbitration before the board shall be made on a form prescribed by the department. The division shall forward to the board all disputes that the division determines are potentially entitled to relief under this chapter.
(6) The division may reject a dispute that it determines to be fraudulent or outside the scope of the board’s authority. Any dispute deemed by the division to be ineligible for arbitration by the board due to insufficient evidence may be reconsidered upon the submission of new information regarding the dispute. Following a second review, the division may reject a dispute if the evidence is clearly insufficient to qualify for relief. Any dispute rejected by the division shall be forwarded to the department and a copy shall be sent by registered mail to the consumer and the manufacturer, containing a brief explanation as to the reason for rejection.
(7) If the division rejects a dispute, the consumer may file a lawsuit to enforce the remedies provided under this chapter. In any civil action arising under this chapter and relating to a matter considered by the division, any determination made to reject a dispute is admissible in evidence.
(8) The department shall have the authority to adopt reasonable rules to carry out the provisions of this section.

681.1095 Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board.
Creation and function.

(1) There is established within the Department of Legal Affairs, the Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board, consisting of members appointed by the Attorney General for an initial term of 1 year. Board members may be reappointed for additional terms of 2 years. Each board member is accountable to the Attorney General for the performance of the member’s duties and is exempt from civil liability for any act or omission which occurs while acting in the member’s official capacity. The Department of Legal Affairs shall defend a member in any action against the member or the board which arises from any such act or omission. The Attorney General may establish as many regions of the board as necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
(2) The boards shall hear cases in various locations throughout the state so any consumer whose dispute is approved for arbitration by the division may attend an arbitration hearing at a reasonably convenient location and present a dispute orally. Hearings shall be conducted by panels of three board members assigned by the department. A majority vote of the three-member board panel shall be required to render a decision. Arbitration proceedings under this section shall be open to the public on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms.
(3) Each region of the board shall consist of up to eight members. The members of the board shall construe and apply the provisions of this chapter, and rules adopted thereunder, in making their decisions. An administrator and a secretary shall be assigned to each board by the Department of Legal Affairs. At least one member of each board must be a person with expertise in motor vehicle mechanics. A member must not be employed by a manufacturer or a franchised motor vehicle dealer or be a staff member, a decision maker, or a consultant for a procedure. Board members shall be trained in the application of this chapter and any rules adopted under this chapter, shall be reimbursed for travel expenses pursuant to s. 112.061, and shall be compensated at a rate or wage prescribed by the Attorney General.
(4) Before filing a civil action on a matter subject to s. 681.104, the consumer must first submit the dispute to the division, and to the board if such dispute is deemed eligible for arbitration.
(5) Manufacturers shall submit to arbitration conducted by the board if such arbitration is requested by a consumer and the dispute is deemed eligible for arbitration by the division pursuant to s. 681.109.
(6) The board shall hear the dispute within 40 days and render a decision within 60 days after the date the request for arbitration is approved. The board may continue the hearing on its own motion or upon the request of a party for good cause shown. A request for continuance by the consumer constitutes waiver of the time periods set forth in this subsection. The Department of Legal Affairs, at the board’s request, may investigate disputes, and may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and for the production of records, documents, and other evidence before the board. The failure of the board to hear a dispute or render a decision within the prescribed periods does not invalidate the decision.
(7) At all arbitration proceedings, the parties may present oral and written testimony, present witnesses and evidence relevant to the dispute, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by counsel. The board may administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses and inspect the vehicle if requested by a party or if the board deems such inspection appropriate.
(8) The board shall grant relief, if a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to correct a nonconformity or nonconformities.
(9) The decision of the board shall be sent by registered mail to the consumer and the manufacturer, and shall contain written findings of fact and rationale for the decision. If the decision is in favor of the consumer, the manufacturer must, within 40 days after receipt of the decision, comply with the terms of the decision. Compliance occurs on the date the consumer receives delivery of an acceptable replacement motor vehicle or the refund specified in the arbitration award. In any civil action arising under this chapter and relating to a dispute arbitrated before the board, any decision by the board is admissible in evidence.
(10) A decision is final unless appealed by either party. A petition to the circuit court to appeal a decision must be made within 30 days after receipt of the decision. The petition shall be filed in the county where the consumer resides, or where the motor vehicle was acquired, or where the arbitration hearing was conducted. Within 7 days after the petition has been filed, the appealing party must send a copy of the petition to the department. If the department does not receive notice of such petition within 40 days after the manufacturer’s receipt of a decision in favor of the consumer, and the manufacturer has neither complied with, nor has petitioned to appeal such decision, the department may apply to the circuit court to seek imposition of a fine up to $1,000 per day against the manufacturer until the amount stands at twice the purchase price of the motor vehicle, unless the manufacturer provides clear and convincing evidence that the delay or failure was beyond its control or was acceptable to the consumer as evidenced by a written statement signed by the consumer. If the manufacturer fails to provide such evidence or fails to pay the fine, the department shall initiate proceedings against the manufacturer for failure to pay such fine. The proceeds from the fine herein imposed shall be placed in the Motor Vehicle Warranty Trust Fund in the department for implementation and enforcement of this chapter. If the manufacturer fails to comply with the provisions of this subsection, the court shall affirm the award upon application by the consumer.
(11) All provisions in this section and s. 681.109 pertaining to compulsory arbitration before the board, the dispute eligibility screening by the division, the proceedings and decisions of the board, and any appeals thereof, are exempt from the provisions of chapter 120.
(12) An appeal of a decision by the board to the circuit court by a consumer or a manufacturer shall be by trial de novo. In a written petition to appeal a decision by the board, the appealing party must state the action requested and the grounds relied upon for appeal. Within 30 days of final disposition of the appeal, the appealing party shall furnish the department with notice of such disposition and, upon request, shall furnish the department with a copy of the order or judgment of the court.
(13) If a decision of the board in favor of the consumer is upheld by the court, recovery by the consumer shall include the pecuniary value of the award, attorney’s fees incurred in obtaining confirmation of the award, and all costs and continuing damages in the amount of $25 per day for each day beyond the 40-day period following the manufacturer’s receipt of the board’s decision. If a court determines that the manufacturer acted in bad faith in bringing the appeal or brought the appeal solely for the purpose of harassment or in complete absence of a justiciable issue of law or fact, the court shall double, and may triple, the amount of the total award.
(14) When a judgment affirms a decision by the board in favor of a consumer, appellate review may be conditioned upon payment by the manufacturer of the consumer’s attorney’s fees and giving security for costs and expenses resulting from the review period.
(15) The department shall maintain records of each dispute submitted to the board, and the program, including an index of motor vehicles by year, make, and model, and shall compile aggregate annual statistics for all disputes submitted to, and decided by, the board, as well as annual statistics for each manufacturer that include, but are not limited to, the value, if applicable, and the number and percent of:

(a) Replacement motor vehicle requests;
(b) Purchase price refund requests;
(c) Replacement motor vehicles obtained in prehearing settlements;
(d) Purchase price refunds obtained in prehearing settlements;
(e) Replacement motor vehicles awarded in arbitration;
(f) Purchase price refunds awarded in arbitration;
(g) Board decisions neither complied with in 40 days nor petitioned for appeal within 30 days;
(h) Board decisions appealed;
(i) Appeals affirmed by the court; and
(j) Appeals found by the court to be brought in bad faith or solely for the purpose of harassment.
The statistics compiled under this subsection are public information.

(16) When requested by the department, a manufacturer must verify the settlement terms for disputes that are approved for arbitration but are not decided by the board.

681.1096 Pilot RV Mediation and Arbitration Program.
Creation and qualifications.

(1) This section and s. 681.1097 shall apply to disputes determined eligible under this chapter involving recreational vehicles acquired on or after October 1, 1997, and shall remain in effect until September 30, 2001, at which time recreational vehicle disputes shall be subject to the provisions of ss. 681.109 and 681.1095. The Attorney General shall report annually to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of each house of the Legislature, and appropriate legislative committees regarding the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the pilot program.
(2) Each manufacturer of a recreational vehicle involved in a dispute that is determined eligible under this chapter, including chassis and component manufacturers which separately warrant the chassis and components and which otherwise meet the definition of manufacturer set forth in s. 681.102(14), shall participate in a mediation and arbitration program that is deemed qualified by the department.
(3) In order to be deemed qualified by the department, the mediation and arbitration program must, at a minimum, meet the following requirements:

(a) The program must be administered by an administrator and staff that is sufficiently insulated from the manufacturer to ensure impartial mediation and arbitration services.
(b) Program administration fees must be paid by the manufacturer and no such fees shall be charged to a consumer.
(c) The program must be adequately staffed at a level sufficient to ensure the provision of fair and expeditious dispute resolution services.
(d) Program mediators and arbitrators must be sufficiently insulated from a manufacturer to ensure the provision of impartial mediation and arbitration of disputes.
(e) Program mediators and arbitrators shall not be employed by a manufacturer or a motor vehicle dealer.
(f) Program mediators must complete a Florida Supreme Court certified circuit or county mediation training program, or other mediation training program approved by the department, in addition to a minimum of one-half day of training on this chapter conducted by the department.
(g) Program mediators must comply with the Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators issued by the American Arbitration Association, the Dispute Resolution Section of the American Bar Association, and the Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution.
(h) Program arbitrators must complete a Florida Supreme Court certified circuit or county arbitration program, or other arbitration training program approved by the department, in addition to a minimum of 1 day of training in the application of this chapter and any rules adopted thereunder conducted by the department.
(i) Program arbitrators must comply with the Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes published by the American Arbitration Association and the American Bar Association in 1977 and as amended.
(j) Program arbitrators must construe and apply the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted thereunder in making decisions.
(k) The program must complete all mediation and arbitration of an eligible consumer claim within 70 days of the program administrator’s receipt of the claim from the department. Failure of the program to complete all proceedings within the prescribed period will not invalidate any settlement agreement or arbitration decision.
(l) Mediation conferences and arbitration proceedings must be held at reasonably convenient locations within the state so as to enable a consumer to attend and present a dispute orally.

(4) The department shall monitor the program for compliance with this chapter. If the program is determined not qualified or if qualification is revoked, then the involved manufacturer shall be required to submit to arbitration conducted by the board if such arbitration is requested by a consumer and the dispute is deemed eligible for arbitration by the division pursuant to s. 681.109.
(5) If a program is determined not qualified or if qualification is revoked, the involved manufacturer shall be notified by the department of any deficiencies in the program and informed that it is entitled to a hearing pursuant to chapter 120.
(6) The program administrator, mediators, and arbitrators are exempt from civil liability arising from any act or omission in connection with any mediation or arbitration conducted under this chapter.
(7) The program administrator shall maintain records of each dispute submitted to the program, including the recordings of arbitration hearings. All records maintained by the program under this chapter shall be public records and shall be available for inspection by the department upon reasonable notice. The records for disputes closed as of September 30 of each year shall be turned over to the department by the program administrator by no later than October 30 of the same year, unless a later date is specified by the department.

(8) The department shall have the authority to adopt reasonable rules to carry out the provisions of this section.

681.1097 RV Pilot Mediation and Arbitration Program.
Dispute eligibility and program function.

(1) Before filing a civil action on a matter subject to s. 681.104, a consumer who acquires a recreational vehicle must first submit the dispute to the department, and to the program if the dispute is deemed eligible. Such consumer is not required to resort to a procedure certified pursuant to s. 681.108, notwithstanding that one of the manufacturers of the recreational vehicle has such a procedure. Such consumer is not required to resort to arbitration conducted by the board, except as provided in s. 681.1096(4) and in this section.
(2) A consumer acquiring a recreational vehicle must apply to participate in this program with respect to a claim arising during the Lemon Law rights period by filing the application in subsection (3) with the department no later than 60 days after the expiration of the Lemon Law rights period.
(3) The consumer’s application for participation in the program must be on a form prescribed or approved by the department. The department shall screen all applications to participate in the program to determine eligibility. The department shall forward to the program administrator all applications the department determines are potentially entitled to relief under this chapter.

(a) If the department determines the application lacks sufficient information from which a determination of eligibility can be made, the department shall request additional information from the consumer and, upon review of such additional information, shall determine whether the application is eligible or reject the application as incomplete.
(b) The department shall reject any application it determines to be fraudulent or outside the scope of this chapter.
(c) The consumer and the manufacturer shall be notified in writing by the department if an application is rejected. Such notification of rejection shall include a brief explanation as to the reason for the rejection.
(d) If the department rejects a dispute, the consumer may file a lawsuit to enforce the remedies provided under this chapter. In any civil action arising under this chapter and relating to the matter considered by the department, any determination made to reject a dispute is admissible in evidence.

(4) Mediation shall be mandatory for both the consumer and manufacturer, unless the dispute is settled prior to the scheduled mediation conference. The mediation conference shall be confidential and inadmissible in any subsequent adversarial proceedings. Participation shall be limited to the parties directly involved in the dispute and their attorneys, if any. All manufacturers shall be represented by persons with settlement authority.

(a) Upon receipt of an eligible application from the department, the program administrator shall notify the consumer and all involved manufacturers in writing that an eligible application has been received. Such notification shall include a statement that a mediation conference will be scheduled, shall identify the assigned mediator, and provide information regarding the program’s procedures. The program administrator shall provide all involved manufacturers with a copy of the completed application.
(b) The mediator shall be selected and assigned by the program administrator. The parties may factually object to a mediator based upon the mediator’s past or present relationship with a party or a party’s attorney, direct or indirect, whether financial, professional, social, or of any other kind. The program administrator shall consider any such objection, determine its validity, and notify the parties of any determination. If the objection is determined valid, the program administrator shall assign another mediator to the case.
(c) At the mediation conference, the mediator shall assist the parties’ efforts to reach a mutually acceptable settlement of their dispute; however, the mediator shall not impose any settlement upon the parties.
(d) Upon conclusion of the mediation conference, the mediator shall notify the program administrator that the case has settled or remains at an impasse. The program administrator shall notify the department in writing of the outcome of the mediation.
(e) If the mediation conference ends in an impasse, it shall proceed to arbitration pursuant to subsection (5). The program administrator shall immediately notify the parties in writing that the dispute will proceed to arbitration and shall identify the assigned arbitrator.
(f) If the parties enter into a settlement at any time after the dispute has been submitted to the program, such settlement must be reduced to writing, signed by the consumer and all involved manufacturers, and filed with the program administrator. The program administrator shall send a copy to the department. All settlements must contain, at a minimum, the following information:

  1. Name and address of the consumer.
  2. Name and address of each involved manufacturer.
  3. Year, make, model, and vehicle identification number of the subject recreational vehicle.
  4. Name and address of the dealership from which the recreational vehicle was acquired.
  5. Date the claim was received by the program administrator.
  6. Name of the mediator and/or arbitrator, if any.
  7. Statement of the terms of the agreement, including, but not limited to: whether the vehicle is to be reacquired by a manufacturer and the identity of the manufacturer that will reacquire the vehicle; the amount of any moneys to be paid by the consumer and/or a manufacturer; the year, make, and model of any replacement motor vehicle or motor vehicle accepted by the consumer as a trade-assist; and a time certain for performance not to exceed 40 days from the date the settlement agreement is signed by the parties.

(g) If a manufacturer fails to perform within the time required in any settlement agreement, the consumer must notify the program administrator of such failure in writing within 10 days of the required performance date. Within 10 days of receipt of such notice, the program administrator shall notify the department of the manufacturer’s failure in compliance and shall schedule the matter for an arbitration hearing pursuant to subsection (5).

(5) If the mediation ends in an impasse, or if a manufacturer fails to comply with the settlement entered into between the parties, the program administrator shall schedule the dispute for an arbitration hearing. Arbitration proceedings shall be open to the public on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms.

(a) The arbitration hearing shall be conducted by a single arbitrator assigned by the program administrator. The arbitrator shall not be the same person as the mediator who conducted the prior mediation conference in the dispute. The parties may factually object to an arbitrator based on the arbitrator’s past or present relationship with a party or a party’s attorney, direct or indirect, whether financial, professional, social, or of any other kind. The program administrator shall consider any such objection, determine its validity, and notify the parties of any determination. If the objection is determined valid, the program administrator shall assign another arbitrator to the case.
(b) The arbitrator may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and for the production of records, documents, and other evidence. Subpoenas so issued shall be served and, upon application to the court by a party to the arbitration, enforced in the manner provided by law for the service and enforcement of subpoenas in civil actions. Fees for attendance as a witness shall be the same as for a witness in the circuit court.
(c) At all program arbitration proceedings, the parties may present oral and written testimony, present witnesses and evidence relevant to the dispute, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by counsel. The arbitrator shall record the arbitration hearing and shall have the power to administer oaths. The arbitrator may inspect the vehicle if requested by a party or if the arbitrator considers such inspection appropriate.
(d) The program arbitrator may continue a hearing on his or her own motion or upon the request of a party for good cause shown. A request for continuance by the consumer constitutes a waiver of the time period set forth in s. 681.1096(3)(k) for completion of all proceedings under the program.
(e) Where the arbitration is the result of a manufacturer’s failure to perform in accordance with a mediation agreement, any relief to the consumer granted by the arbitration will be no less than the relief agreed to by the manufacturer in the settlement agreement.
(f) The arbitrator shall grant relief if a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to correct a nonconformity or nonconformities.
(g) The program arbitrator shall render a decision within 10 days of the closing of the hearing. The decision shall be in writing on a form prescribed or approved by the department. The program administrator shall send a copy of the decision to the consumer and each involved manufacturer by registered mail. The program administrator shall also send a copy of the decision to the department within 5 days of mailing to the parties.
(h) A manufacturer shall comply with an arbitration decision within 40 days of the date the manufacturer receives the written decision. Compliance occurs on the date the consumer receives delivery of an acceptable replacement motor vehicle or the refund specified in the arbitration award. If a manufacturer fails to comply within the time required, the consumer must notify the program administrator in writing within 10 days. The program administrator shall notify the department of a manufacturer’s failure to comply. The department shall have the authority to enforce compliance with arbitration decisions under this section in the same manner as is provided for enforcement of compliance with board decisions under s. 681.1095(10). In any civil action arising under this chapter and relating to a dispute arbitrated pursuant to this section, the decision of the arbitrator is admissible in evidence.

(6) Except as otherwise provided, all provisions in this section pertaining to mandatory mediation and arbitration, eligibility screening, mediation proceedings, arbitration hearings and decisions, and any appeals thereof are exempt from the provisions of chapter 120.
(7) Either party may make application to the circuit court for the county in which one of the parties resides or has a place of business or, if neither party resides or has a place of business in this state, the county where the arbitration hearing was held, for an order confirming, vacating, modifying, or correcting any award, in accordance with the provisions of this section and ss. 682.12, 682.13, 682.14, 682.15, and 682.17. Such application must be filed within 30 days of the moving party’s receipt of the written decision or the decision becomes final. Upon filing such application, the moving party shall mail a copy to the department and, upon entry of any judgment or decree, shall mail a copy of such judgment or decree to the department. A review of such application by the circuit court shall be confined to the record of the proceedings before the program arbitrator. The court shall conduct a de novo review of the questions of law raised in the application. In addition to the grounds set forth in ss. 682.13 and 682.14, the court shall consider questions of fact raised in the application. In reviewing questions of fact, the court shall uphold the award unless it determines that the factual findings of the arbitrator are not supported by substantial evidence in the record and that the substantial rights of the moving party have been prejudiced. If the arbitrator fails to state findings or reasons for the stated award, or the findings or reasons are inadequate, the court shall search the record to determine whether a basis exists to uphold the award. The court shall expedite consideration of any application filed under this section on the calendar.

(a) If a decision of a program arbitrator in favor of a consumer is confirmed by the court, recovery by the consumer shall include the pecuniary value of the award, attorney’s fees incurred in obtaining confirmation of the award, and all costs and continuing damages in the amount of $25 per day for each day beyond the 40-day period following a manufacturer’s receipt of the arbitrator’s decision. If a court determines the manufacturer acted in bad faith in bringing the appeal or brought the appeal solely for the purpose of harassment, or in complete absence of a justiciable issue of law or fact, the court shall double, and may triple, the amount of the total award.
(b) An appeal of a judgment or order by the court confirming, denying confirmation, modifying or correcting, or vacating the award may be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action.

(8) The department shall have the authority to adopt reasonable rules to carry out the provisions of this section.

681.110 Compliance and disciplinary actions.
The Department of Legal Affairs may enforce and ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted thereunder, may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and production of evidence, and may seek relief in the circuit court to compel compliance with such subpoenas. The Department of Legal Affairs may impose a civil penalty against a manufacturer not to exceed $1,000 for each count or separate offense. The proceeds from the fine imposed herein shall be placed in the Motor Vehicle Warranty Trust Fund in the Department of Legal Affairs for implementation and enforcement of this chapter.

681.111 Unfair or deceptive trade practice.
A violation by a manufacturer of this chapter is an unfair or deceptive trade practice as defined in part II of chapter 501.

681.112 Consumer remedies.

(1) A consumer may file an action to recover damages caused by a violation of this chapter. The court shall award a consumer who prevails in such action the amount of any pecuniary loss, litigation costs, reasonable attorney’s fees, and appropriate equitable relief.
(2) An action brought under this chapter must be commenced within 1 year after the expiration of the Lemon Law rights period, or, if a consumer resorts to an informal dispute-settlement procedure or submits a dispute to the division or board, within 1 year after the final action of the procedure, division, or board.
(3) This chapter does not prohibit a consumer from pursuing other rights or remedies under any other law.

681.113 Dealer liability.
Except as provided in ss. 681.103(3) and 681.114(2), nothing in this chapter imposes any liability on a dealer as defined in s. 320.60(11)(a) or creates a cause of action by a consumer against a dealer, except for written express warranties made by the dealer apart from the manufacturer’s warranties. A dealer may not be made a party defendant in any action involving or relating to this chapter, except as provided in this section. The manufacturer shall not charge back or require reimbursement by the dealer for any costs, including, but not limited to, any refunds or vehicle replacements, incurred by the manufacturer arising out of this chapter, in the absence of evidence that the related repairs had been carried out by the dealer in a manner substantially inconsistent with the manufacturer’s published instructions.

681.114 Resale of returned vehicles.

(1) A manufacturer who accepts the return of a motor vehicle by reason of a settlement, determination, or decision pursuant to this chapter shall notify the department and report the vehicle identification number of that motor vehicle within 10 days after such acceptance, transfer, or disposal of the vehicle, whichever occurs later.
(2) A person shall not knowingly lease, sell at wholesale or retail, or transfer a title to a motor vehicle returned by reason of a settlement, determination, or decision pursuant to this chapter or similar statute of another state unless the nature of the nonconformity is clearly and conspicuously disclosed to the prospective transferee, lessee, or buyer, and the manufacturer warrants to correct such nonconformity for a term of 1 year or 12,000 miles, whichever occurs first. The Department of Legal Affairs shall prescribe by rule the form, content, and procedure pertaining to such disclosure statement.
(3) As used in this section, the term “settlement” means an agreement entered into between a manufacturer and consumer that occurs after a dispute is submitted to a procedure or program or is approved for arbitration before the board.

681.115 Certain agreements void.
Any agreement entered into by a consumer that waives, limits, or disclaims the rights set forth in this chapter is void as contrary to public policy. The rights set forth in this chapter shall extend to a subsequent transferee of such motor vehicle.

681.116 Preemption.
This chapter preempts any similar county or municipal ordinance regarding consumer warranty rights resulting from the acquisition of a motor vehicle in this state.

681.117 Fee.

(1) A $2 fee shall be collected by a motor vehicle dealer, or by a person engaged in the business of leasing motor vehicles, from the consumer at the consummation of the sale of a motor vehicle or at the time of entry into a lease agreement for a motor vehicle. Such fees shall be remitted to the county tax collector or private tag agency acting as agent for the Department of Revenue. All fees, less the cost of administration, shall be transferred monthly to the Department of Legal Affairs for deposit into the Motor Vehicle Warranty Trust Fund. The Department of Legal Affairs shall distribute monthly an amount not exceeding one-fourth of the fees received to the Division of Consumer Services of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to carry out the provisions of ss. 681.108 and 681.109. The Department of Legal Affairs shall contract with the Division of Consumer Services for payment of services performed by the division pursuant to ss. 681.108 and 681.109.
(2) The Department of Revenue shall administer, collect, and enforce the fee authorized under this section pursuant to the provisions of chapter 212. The fee shall not be included in the computation of estimated taxes pursuant to s. 212.11(1)(a), nor shall the dealer’s credit provided under s. 212.12 apply to the fee. The provisions of chapter 212 regarding the authority to audit and make assessments, the keeping of books and records, and interest and penalties on delinquent fees apply to the fee imposed by this section.

681.118 Rulemaking authority.
The Department of Legal Affairs shall adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement the provisions of this chapter.

TruDream Properties, LLCExcellentTruDream Properties, LLC4.8 Based on 156 reviews fromSee all reviews review us onDave D.Dave D. ★☆☆☆☆ I left a voice mail and email but no reply yet. I bought a property for my son for his 16th birthday and you placed the title into my sons name and recorded it. He is now in college and wants to sell the property but unbeknownst to us you changed the warranty deed 6 months later (Osceola County Book 6066 and Page 666 - 666 how appropriate). You didn't attempt to notify my son by email, phone or snail mail. He is now 21 years old and feels he was taken advantage of. If he sells the property he will now need to hire a lawyer to straighten it out. It looks like you secretively reduced the quantity of land so you could sell some of it to someone else. Please contact me about this.Response from the ownerDue to Google limitations, the following is a slightly shortened version of an email was sent to Mr. Daniels, who allowed us 2 hours to respond to his original voicemail before publicly smearing me and my companies:I want to address your concerns regarding the property you purchased from us. Here are the facts we have and a timeline of events: • On or about February 14, 2019, one of our companies purchased 1.244 acres with the APN 26-27-31-0000-1133-001C in Osceola County, FL. • Shortly thereafter, we then hired an engineer and applied to have this property split into 4 smaller parcels. On or about April 3, 2019, we received the official letter from the County granting us this split and providing us with 4 new parcels, 4 new APN numbers and 4 NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS, replacing the original legal description on the Deed to us for the original larger parcel. (see split letter attached). • The county retained the original APN 26-27-31-0000-1133-001C as the first of the four new parcels, but gave it a NEW legal description (see split letter again), replacing the old legal description. The other APNs created by this split were (…003C, 004C, 005C ) and each of these also received a new legal description.• Our intention was to sell these new smaller parcels, approximately .311 acres each as separate property sales. • On our about, December 16, 2019, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell ONE of these 4 smaller parcels to you, David Daniels. This sale was for .311 acres with Assessor’s Parcel Number 26-27-31-0000-1133-001C for a price of $3,000. This APN and acreage is clearly marked on your purchase agreement and in Exhibit A of that agreement (See Attached). • After 2 years of making $125.00 payments for a total of $3,000 plus taxes/fees for this .311 acre parcel of land, we prepared and filed a Deed in your son’s name, at your request. This original Deed was recorded on June 24, 2021. Because this occurred 4 ½ years ago, we cannot locate any documents on this, but our best guess is that the County notified us of a problem with the legal description in the months that followed as the one we used no longer exists because of the parcel split the County approved prior to your purchase. • Therefore, on or about October 15, 2021, we prepared and filed a Corrective Deed, merely fixing the legal description so that it matched the proper legal description for the .311 acre property you purchased with an APN of 26-27-31-0000-1133-001C (Again, clearly marked on your purchase agreement and in Exhibit A of that agreement). Otherwise, title to the property would not have passed to your son and would have remained in the name of TDP – FL, LLC. Corrective deeds are a common and routine instrument in real estate transactions, used to fix clerical or technical errors such as this. There was nothing improper or misleading about the filing, and no additional property was taken from or withheld from you. You received exactly the parcel identified in your contract, for the agreed-upon price of only $3,000 plus fees/taxes.Our standard practice is to provide copies of all recorded deeds to buyers. In this instance, since you requested that the deed be issued in your son’s name, it is possible the recorded copy was sent to him or it was somehow misplaced or buried in email or lost by the usps, who knows. Given these facts, we are confident that nothing improper occurred, and that you received exactly what you agreed to purchase.Any attorney reviewing the purchase agreement, exhibits, and recorded deeds should be able to confirm the accuracy of what has been done. We take these matters seriously and strive to handle every transaction properly and transparently. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify this and hope we can put the matter to rest promptly and professionally. If there is any information I am missing about a problem with this Deed I did not address, please provide that to us. LV N.LV N. ★★★★★ I will tell you this when it comes to your best interest boy oh boy they really get off and running for the finish line and winning is where they are heading plus they go way above what is expected of them so if you are looking for the best then look no further than Kahn & Associates.P. S.P. S. ★★★★★ I have an excellent experience with TruDream Properties team. First, I was able to identify two pieces land for a great price and I acquired them for an affordable monthly payment. Second, six years later, I got notified I completed all payments, and TruDream has filed for, obtained, and delivered two deed documents to me. This service is a well deserved FIVE STAR rating.Abby P.Abby P. ★★★★★ Great to work with. Super responsive and honest. Was able to get me a good settlement. I would highly suggestMichael L.Michael L. ★★★★★ I had an issue with my 2024 vehicle for a water leak. I purchased in Oct 2023 and in January 2024, noticed there was water on the floorboard. I took it to the dealer and they tried to reseal the windshield but it didn’t work. The second time I took it in, the dealer replaced the rear windshield. Still not repaired. The third time the dealer removed and resealed the windshield and that finally did the trick.

However, these three repairs took 79 days total to complete. After doing research, I found out that the vehicle fell under the lemon law due to dealer having vehicle for more than 20 days at one time….twice.

I called Kahn & Associates and explained my situation and they started working on my case immediately.

After a few phone calls and texts with documentation they started the process. It takes a while but this firm went above and beyond in my opinion to get any type of solution to the vehicle. We got the options of buying back the vehicle or a settlement, so we took the settlement option due to the lifetime warranty through the dealer. This took most of 2024 to settle but it’s finally resolved.

Thanks to Kahn & Associates and staff for helping us during this time. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!!!!
Matt S.Matt S. ★★★★★ I used Kahn & Associates services
I bought a new truck that stayed in the shop for months I tried and tried
To get the dealership to work with me sense it was a new truck they told me pretty much that I was stuck with the truck!! That’s when I contacted Kahn they worked hard to get the manufacture of the truck to take care of their Lemon!!! I cannot thank these guys enough They got me the settlement I was looking for they get a five star rating from me
Sophia N.Sophia N. ★★★★★ They helped me with my lemon. are from Ford and I got my settlement some money I put down o. the car they are highly recommended they did a wonderful job.The Most Valuable Plant S.The Most Valuable Plant S. ★★★★★ Just Wanna Say They Are Great At Communication They work with us when we fall behind and are very understanding great people great locations for land and they also give you that lifetime opportunity when no one else will so highly recommend them but remember to get your dream property it's takes us the customers to make it home so get out there and be a man buy land or lady 🤣🌴 🤣🌴Tara R.Tara R. ★★★★★ Just bought a property in CA. Everything went perfect and I may buy another piece of property.Jeb H.Jeb H. ★★★★★ Bought a place in Florida I am three years into a 4 year loanDavid R.David R. ★★★★★ I am thankful that Khan & Associate! They helped me recover losses from a defective vehicle that I Purchased! They are very easy to work with and explained everything that was going on every step of the way! Thank you for representing me!Sonia M.Sonia M. ★★★★★ A friend recommended TDP AND THAT IT WAS SUPER EASY TO HAVE A PROPERTY WITH LITTLE MONEY AND I WAS RESEARCHING AND ONE YEAR PASSED AND A FEW DAYS AGO I CLOSED THE DEAL WITH THE TDP COMPANY... AND A GREAT OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE I ASKED GOD FOR A ONE MY PROPERTY, in only 1 day we did everything. Thank you .Belva C.Belva C. ★★★★☆ The process was rather quick, once we agreed on the terms. All of my concerns were addressed. This is my first experience with this type of purchase.Missy R.Missy R. ★★★★★ I contacted TDP and within 72 hours had a signed agreement for land purchase and and a new Land owner. Best experience ever.. I will be purchasing more properties within the year. Love the efficiency, promptness and professionalism for Mary. She is Awesome at what she does. Thank you again Mary😊Mike B.Mike B. ★★★★★ Incredibly easy to work with, received a fair offer and the process was seamless. We had a title question that had to be resolved and they guided me through the process. I would definitely go through them again!Steven D.Steven D. ★★★★★ Professional service and a timely outcome. Thanks for your help. I’d use them again if I had a chance.Babita B.Babita B. ★★★★★ The entire process was seemless from beginning to end. All completed online from the comfort of my home.JonJon ★★★★★ I was initially wary of conducting a real estate transaction online with an entity I had not met face-to-face before, but TDP was perfectly professional, organized and timely. In a little over a week of my transaction, I have received digital copies of my transaction and deed and have gotten quick responses to my questions throughout my transaction.Laurie S.Laurie S. ★★★★★ What a great great experience I had with them assisting in the matter of my Camaro with GM. They were so so professional , informative, speedy, and so fast and efficient in solving this matter. I felt comfortable from day one till the end! Thank you so very much !!!Jeremy K.Jeremy K. ★★★★★ They are the best. Got my settlement done in a timely manner. Highly recommend 🙂Kumaran NKumaran N ★★★★★ Ms.Mary and Amanda has been extremely helpful in my lands purchase transaction. Mary and Amanda has been very patient, friendly, professional, and helpful in completing our business.I purchased a parcels from Mary and Amanda from out of state and it went very smoothly. They did research for me everything. Even the recording of the deed was done as I sat at home! It was great for me! Mary and Amanda is accommodating but not pushy, easy to get along with. I would highly recommend them as someone to buy from.ShannonShannon ★★★★★ Wonderful, professional, friendly and quick experience with TruDream Properties, LLC when purchasing land from them. Thank you! And I would like to add that the pricing is exceptional and so are your options.Greg B.Greg B. ★★★★★ After hearing great things about this law firm, I had the pleasure of dealing with them firsthand. They promised they would do all they could and they delivered. They were able to get a settlement from the manufacturer and I got to keep my truck. I had 3 major problems that the dealer fixed but it took months.. A++++++++J CJ C ★★★★★ the process was handled in the norm as they advertised; me and my daughter enjoy working w themAmber B.Amber B. ★★★★★ They made selling our property as easy as possible and went out of their way to remedy the issues we encountered along the way.Good G.Good G. ★★★★☆ I purchased two properties from trudream, I got my deeds, about two weeks after I paid for them, I bought one first and then the other one, It is a pretty good company to do business with, exceptcustomer service needs improvement, once you pay for the property its hard to get a hold of anybody on the phone, And that makes people nervous, getting tjhe feeling that you might have gotten riped off, But overall The company is legit and good, I would recomend it, and would buy from them againPhyllis K.Phyllis K. ★★★★★ They were very professional and worked with me from the very 1st day I called about my car. Even though I had issues with getting my proper paperwork they stayed with me all the way!Wesley T.Wesley T. ★☆☆☆☆ Predatory practices with mailings offering 15% of what properties are worth. Either it is on purpose targeted to people who are down on their luck, or it is out of ignorance for local comps.Response from the ownerPlease Note: The following review is from an Owner/Potential Seller of Land, not a Buyer of our Land. We have never spoken to this person, they must have received a marketing letter in the mail from us.Dear Mr. Thompson - Just like thousands of other investors who purchase businesses in distress, houses in foreclosure or needing repairs or even unwanted personal items at a pawn shop, we DO make offers for less than market value (which is highly subjective with vacant land).Our Sellers are people who are TIRED of paying TAXES on something they DON’T USE or WANT; or they are behind on taxes and going to lose the property at a tax sale soon; or they have a need for quick cash or just want to liquidate fast and without hassleIt’s like someone having a garage or estate sale or who goes to a pawn shop. Their number 1 motivation is not spending the time and effort to get top dollar.They are unwilling or uninterested in the time and hassle involved in writing, listing and paying for ads, in multiple sources, taking calls from dozens of tire kickers to try to find the needle in a haystack buyer for a parcel of vacant land.And they certainly don’t want to deal with taking payments from someone and the risk they default and you have to start over again – which happens frequently. This land is like a BIG NOOSE around their NECK and they just want to get rid of it quickly and easily, and out of their life.And that’s exactly where we come in. Our mission is to help these people get out from under land they don’t use or want - as well as the unwanted property taxes or hoa fees - quickly and easily.Anyone who does not want to sell their land to use can simply ignore our offer or tell us no thanks and can ask to be removed from our lists forever. We never pressure anyone to sell us anything they don’t want to sell.We value our customers and our good name as you can see by our testimonials and Google 5 star reviews and it's our goal to make them all as happy as possible.Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience or misunderstanding. Tiffany D.Tiffany D. ★★★★★ I have purchased a few pieces of land from TruDream the second time I was undecided about how and what I wanted to do but Amanda was AWESOME!!! patient was a understatement. Ty again ❤️Ben G.Ben G. ★★★★★ I had a good experience with TruDream properties. They made it easy to buy land at an affordable price. I’m looking forward to doing more business with them in the future.Amando M.Amando M. ★★★★★ A great place to get your property from a nd great customer service. Especially Mary Pontino she is awesome.Justin C.Justin C. ★★★★★ I am currently buying a piece of property from this company and I like the deals that they offer and the prices are fair. Most of all I like their payment system, it is so easy to log in an make payments and even partial payments. They are a good company to buy from.-JustinKate D.Kate D. ★★★★★ I cannot recommend them enough!! After dealing with several serious transmission/engine power/electrical defects with no service center able to fix it, I decided I’d had enough. After hours of researching, I discovered Lemon Law.. I decided to reach out to several law firms. A couple contacted me back, but gave me little hope for a case because I was technically outside of certain specifications to file. It was a little discouraging, and I was ready to take the loss from this vehicle and move on.
HOWEVER, once Kahn & Associates contacted me, they gave me the go-ahead to file and ensured me that they could help me. They explained the ways around it and the federal laws that apply, as well. So I completed the initial consultation and was contacted by Bo Jeffries shortly after.. and when I tell you that EVERY SINGLE communication from that office from there on out was beyond professional and timely, I’m serious. Bo contacted me via phone for our first conversation. He was patient with me, as I was literally at work during the call, but was desperately wanting to speak with him. I had to pause and put him on hold a couple of times.. I also had many questions and scenarios to run by him.. he was so pleasant.. down to earth.. patient.. kind.. and treated me like I was a million dollar client!! I was contacted shortly after that by Victoria Eck, the paralegal for his team, and was given updates on my case.. and I have to say that Vicki is the best!! She is so kind and also incredibly patient with me.. she was so quick to respond to any questions I had, and I mean she has ALWAYS emailed back within MINUTES.. And as we got the ball really rolling into the case, Bo and Vicki have kept me in contact.. I had some issues/delays completing the documentation for the discovery, and she was incredibly patient and helped me with questions and guided me through the process and explained anything I needed more detail on.. The bulk of the process was only the last couple months. I had all my documentation turned in, and in less than two weeks, Bo emailed me in the evening (yes, evening.. well after business hours) to deliver the amazing news that GM had settled, and it was DOUBLE the amount that Bo and I had discussed!! Even further, I had another question regarding settlement paperwork before returning to them, and Bo emailed back within minutes (in the evening and during the weekend) to give me an answer!! I cannot say enough great things about this law firm.. the entire staff is courteous and helpful.. and they will never treat you less than.. !! I’ve even called the office before for Victoria, and another staff member answered.. and even that lady was so kind and helpful and gave me what answer she could and then transferred me to Victoria’s voicemail.. I mean, they are ALL so wonderful.. I’m amazed at how truly wonderful these people are.. I’ve never filed a lawsuit against anyone, let alone something as big as General Motors.. so it was definitely nerve racking at first.. but after my communication with Bo and Victoria, I’ve never felt any nerves.. this whole thing was such a fast process, and I was kept up to date the entire time.. now, I am just going to patiently wait for the settlement check, so I can now get a better vehicle for myself and my child.. thanks again, you guys!! Truly the best!!
Ellen B.Ellen B. ★★★★★ I had the best experience ever dealing with TruDream Properties! There were several land companies I was considering but they were hands down the best choice! I highly recommend giving them a call, they’re very efficient, they’re very professional and they get the job done smoothly and correctly!Monte R.Monte R. ★★★★★ Great buyer and seller. Fast, friendly, and knowledgeable. I highly recommend.Raymond M. B.Raymond M. B. ★★★★★ Very Satisfied with the outcome of my case handled by Kahn and AssociatesJanice D.Janice D. ★★★★★ We received an offer for a piece of Lakeside land that that has been in our family for years and which no one had ever expressed the desire to built on the land. We received a reasonable offer from TruDream Properties, and after having paid taxes and assessments for over 40 years, we decided to accept their offer. The process was handled very professionally and we had no cost in the transaction. The check we received in the end was the exact amount of the original offer. Any questions we had along the way were answered promptly and to our satisfactionTom R.Tom R. ★★★★★ Easy to work with. Settled things quickly on my 2018 Silverado. l recommend them.nasser J.nasser J. ★★★★★ unbelievable prices for property it is works for me to organizemy church people for work shop . thanksRich H.Rich H. ★★★★★ Working with Trudream Properties was a very pleasant experience! They were very service oriented, quick to respond and good to work with. The land. transaction was professionally done in a timely manner. I was well pleased with Trudream Properties and recommend their services!Aimee R.Aimee R. ★★★★★ Excellent company, my family and I are very happy with TruDream Properties, LLC. Our dreams of becoming Property Owners came true thanks to them. They made the process very easy for us and we highly recommend them.Juan N.Juan N. ★★★★★ This was by far the easiest way to purchase land.Easy, convenient and hassle free 👌Paige L.Paige L. ★★★★★ Easiest, streamline service for purchasing property. Best customer service. I search many sites daily looking for real estate to buy and often have to track people down and followup many times to get a response if ever. Their follow-up is immediate making my purchase experience the same. Bought 2 properties the same day bc of how great their service is. Will definitely purchase again!!!Kathryn R.Kathryn R. ★★★★★ Received an offer from TDP and the transaction was smooth as silk. Thank you for the offer.Daniel M.Daniel M. ★★★★★ They are very professional and did a amazing job concerning my Lemon Law Issue.Todd W.Todd W. ★★★★★ It was easy working with TruDream. Entire process was painless and completed in about 6 weeks from offer acceptance to getting the check. I would do it again in a heartbeat if the price is right.Kelsey F.Kelsey F. ★★★★★ I came into the with an open mind and felt I truly had nothing to lose. I never expected that everything would go in my favor, and I am so grateful that I finally responded to the NUMEROUS lemon law letters that I had received regarding my 2017 Pacifica.

After taking it to the dealership, countless times (for the same issues) and being sent away like the issues were normal and nothing to worry about, it was SO nice to be heard and taken seriously by Craig at Kahn and Associates.

The process was painless, the gathered all of my information and then even more from the dealership and went to work. From start to finish, the process took roughly 4 months and the settlement money is in my account.

I was even able to trade in the vehicle with zero issues and the claim had no impact on my trade in value which was a huge concern of mine.

I already have, and will continue to refer my friends and family to Kahn and Associates.
Theophilus A.Theophilus A. ★★★★☆ Friendly customer service very helpful quick easy purchase of land only thing I wish was a little better communication on how and what I have to do to get the deed other than that A+Ellie S.Ellie S. ★★★★★ Thank you so much for my successful law suit. I am impressed how well you updated me and communicated the process. Thank you Dan and Victoria.jose G.jose G. ★★★★★ Great companyThe purchase was seamless and very fastCan not wait to go to the farm and relax in the natureEmmanuel M.Emmanuel M. ★☆☆☆☆ Be prepared to receive an offer for your land that is a fraction of its true value. If you need to sell your land consult with your local neighbors or real estate agents before you accept any offer from anyone.danielle P.danielle P. ★★★★★ Thank you for the ease of purchasing our properties In Florida. It was an easy seamless way to sell our properties. Every step was exactly as explained on the website. Will be checking back with them when I am ready to sell more of my properties.Melquan O.Melquan O. ★★★★★ This company makes the purchase of raw land very smooth. Many payment options. Please do your own due diligence although this company does the research and acts ethically. There was a property I began the purchase process for and when there were title issues, I was immediately refunded and the property was taken off market to resolve the issues. Great companyPOXIBLE C.POXIBLE C. ★★★★★ They are an amazing company, totally serious, we had a deal, they honored them word and now I am a happy owner of a good piece of land. Thank you so much !!Roy T.Roy T. ★★★★★ TruDream helped us to sell several desert properties that we haven't been able to sell through other means. Their rapid and professional service was terrific. Their process was also very clear and easy.tchentchen94tchentchen94 ★★★★★ When I received an offer to sell my property, I only wanted to GIVE IT A TRY (after so many other similar companies had disappointed and betrayed me), but I delved in there for an overwhelmingly pleasant surprise! Everything unfolded quickly, efficiently, and effectively! I would grant them more stars if this were feasible! TruDream Properties, LLC is an example to emulate!Michael H.Michael H. ★★★★★ I had a great experience with Kahn & Associates. They helped me gain leverage to get my new car fixed and got a settlement as well!jh zjh z ★★★★★ Best company I ever found , I search so many companies to purchase land properties and this Trudream properties was the only one that can negotiate very easy , thanks TRUDREAM PROPERTIES , DREAMS REELY CAME REAL.Valerie C.Valerie C. ★★★★★ This company was very accommodating. They helped me navigate through unexpected issues on my end. Were always quick to reply to any of my questions, and we're prompt on payment.Janet G. S.Janet G. S. ★★★★★ They worked very hard my law suit and helped to get me a settlement on my car.Tom L.Tom L. ★★★★★ I recommend Kahn and associates to represent anyone having issues with their vehicles ( lemons). I'm satisfied with my settlement and they always kept me updated by phone , text and email. Thanks for all you have done for me.Dwight L.Dwight L. ★★★★★ I would recommend you call them if you feel that you have been taken advantage of by a car company or car dealer., they will make it right and get you what you deserve. They were wonderfulBrigitte Williams P.Brigitte Williams P. ★★★★★ They were so helpful and did everything in a timely manner. Always there to answer questions. I highly recommendSandy W.Sandy W. ★★★★★ They were awesome! Listened and helped us with everything ! Didn’t take very long at all! Would advise anyone to use them
js_loader